Some owners of WeWork’s more than 700 properties are objecting to the company’s plans to shut down many of its locations in bankruptcy. 

Objections filed on Tuesday (Nov 21), the deadline for such motions, pushed back on the company’s timeline for rejecting leases, and rules they say wrongly favour WeWork. For example, one landlord claims WeWork would retain the right to stay in a location, even after cancelling a lease.

The filings provide a fresh look at the delicate balance WeWork must strike as it seeks to renegotiate or shed onerous leases, a key part of its bankruptcy plan. It is in talks with landlords for hundreds of properties about rent cuts and other concessions, and must be careful not to push so aggressively that landlords choose to walk away and seek new occupants. 

“WeWork is walking a fine line because it has to aggressively cut rent costs in order to reorganise successfully, but at the same time its future depends on maintaining healthy relationships with some of those same landlords, if it hopes to strike new agreements with them after emerging from bankruptcy,” said Evan DuFaux, a special situations analyst at the research firm CreditSights. “The case is likely to turn on the landlords’ strategy regarding renegotiation and rejection of leases.”

Regulatory filings showed that plans during bankruptcy discussions with creditors involved shuttering nearly half of its US and Canadian locations. The company has not shared new figures since filing for Chapter 11, but said in a response to questions from Bloomberg that the disclosed numbers were “outdated” and did not reflect the “significant progress” made in talks since then. 

WeWork filed for bankruptcy on Nov 6, a move that gave it broad rights to reject or cancel contract agreements that are not financially feasible, including leases. It was earlier attempting to negotiate with landlords outside of court. 

A NEWSLETTER FOR YOU

Tuesday, 12 pm

Property Insights

Get an exclusive analysis of real estate and property news in Singapore and beyond.

Sign Up

WeWork’s advisers from law firm Kirkland & Ellis and real estate specialist Hilco Global have been asking for rent cuts in a range of sizes, sometimes above 25 per cent, according to a person with knowledge of the matter who asked not to be identified discussing private information. 

Some landlords have also expressed concern over their ability to draw on collateral that guaranteed their rental income. A US$1.5 billion letter of credit facility that backed rent promises at some of the properties is of issue in some of their objections.

“(WeWork) appears to be trying to play a game of ‘gotcha’ with unsuspecting mom-and-pop landlords in order to force them into what are effectively new leases that WeWork would otherwise be unable to obtain in any legal or consensual manner,” lawyers for the owner of the company’s headquarters said in a court filing.

The company will be back in court next week to ask Judge John Sherwood to approve rules for cancelling leases and paying any associated costs. Such rules are typically seen in big retail cases, where a company faces pressure to quickly analyse the profitability of hundreds of stores and then decide which to close and which to keep open.

Under Chapter 11 rules, companies have up to 210 days to decide whether to cancel a lease. Other contracts, like those signed with suppliers or customers, have no time limit. BLOOMBERG