FORMER UK prime minister Boris Johnson deliberately misled the British Parliament in an unprecedented way over rule-breaking parties at his office during Covid-19 lockdowns, a committee said in a damning verdict.

Almost a year ago, Johnson was talking about remaining prime minister into the 2030s. But the House of Commons Privileges Committee – the main disciplinary body for lawmakers – said on Thursday (Jun 15) that he should now be stripped of having automatic access to Parliament.

The committee also accused Johnson of being “complicit in a campaign of abuse and attempted intimidation” towards it.

In his typically combative style, Johnson, who led the Conservatives to a landslide election victory in 2019, dismissed the report as “a lie” and “a charade”. He also accused committee members of waging a vendetta against him.

The stand-off will do little to heal the deep divisions among the Conservatives, and can only pile pressure on Prime Minister Rishi Sunak, whose push to boost Britain’s flagging economy is being overshadowed by the ongoing Johnson drama.

The more than 100-page report detailed six events held at Downing Street, the prime minister’s offices and residence.

GET BT IN YOUR INBOX DAILY

Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.

Sign UpVIEW ALL

“We conclude, that in deliberately misleading the House, Mr Johnson committed a serious contempt,” the committee said. “The contempt was all the more serious because it was committed by the prime minister, the most senior member of the government. There is no precedent for a prime minister having been found to have deliberately misled the House.”

The committee recommended that Johnson should not be entitled to a former member’s pass, which enables most former prime ministers and lawmakers to gain automatic access to Parliament. Parliament will consider the committee’s recommendation on Monday.

Asked about the report’s conclusions, a spokesperson for Sunak said the prime minister had not read it, but he believed the committee had carried out the inquiry properly and that “it would not be right to traduce or criticise” the committee’s work.

The Privileges Committee comprises four Conservatives and three opposition lawmakers. It rejected Johnson’s defence that the gatherings were within the rules and that his advisers had supported his belief that was the case.

Instead, it said, Johnson was “deliberately disingenuous when he tried to reinterpret his statements to the House, to avoid their plain meaning and reframe the clear impression that he intended to give”.

It added that if Johnson were still a Member of Parliament (MP), it would have recommended a suspension from the House for 90 days.

Damning

Johnson resigned from Parliament last week after seeing an advance copy of the report. He called the inquiry a “witch hunt”, a criticism he repeated after its publication.

“I believed, correctly, that these events were reasonably necessary for work purposes. We were managing a pandemic,” he said in a statement. He added that the report marked a “dreadful day” for MPs and for democracy.

“This decision means that no MP is free from vendetta, or expulsion on trumped-up charges by a tiny minority who want to see him or her gone from the (House of) Commons,” he said.

He accused the committee of using mystical powers to see things that he had not seen at Downing Street, when, he said, he was duty-bound to thank staff who were departing or for their work on Covid-19. The committee did not accept his defence.

The Labour Party said the report was “damning”.

“While Rishi Sunak is distracted with the ongoing Tory soap opera, people are crying out for leadership on the issues that matter to them,” said Thangam Debbonaire, a member of Labour’s top team.

A former Johnson aide said the report did little more than confirm his “semi-retirement”, from where he would still exert “huge influence” over the Conservative Party.

Johnson has apologised for his conduct, but repeatedly denied deliberately misleading Parliament, saying that he took advice from aides who said his office was following the rules.

But the so-called Partygate spelt the beginning of the end for his tenure as prime minister. A rebellion in the Conservative Party last year, when ministers resigned en masse, forced him in July 2022 to say he would step down. He left office in September.

He resigned from Parliament last week, ending his time as a backbench lawmaker who continued to wield significant influence among the Conservatives, at times undermining Sunak’s authority.

Johnson and Sunak rowed this week over the former prime minister’s resignation honours list. REUTERS