The absurdity of ‘sovereign citizens’
IN SINGAPORE, there have been at least three recent legal cases where a defendant has claimed to be a “sovereign citizen”. This would supposedly let them be exempted from abiding by the laws of the land or respecting its courts.
These claims have received short shrift from a legal system that refuses to recognise any such status – with good reason.
The origins of the sovereign citizen idea lie in the Posse Comitatus, a far-right agglomeration of groups founded in the US in the late 1960s. A racist movement that was anti-Black and anti-Semitic, it claimed that Jews controlled and manipulated federal institutions and that only county-level elected government was legitimate.
KEYWORDS IN THIS ARTICLE
BT is now on Telegram!
For daily updates on weekdays and specially selected content for the weekend. Subscribe to t.me/BizTimes
Opinion & Features
If inflation continues to build, the Fed won’t be able to maintain neutral stance for long
Singapore offices await a new wave of tenants
S-chip IPOs may be coming again, but don’t count on investors getting too excited
London watchdog’s name-and-shame plan is mad, bad and dangerous to the City
Foxconn’s musical chairs sound like punk rock
Asset owners can’t afford to sidestep sustainability